authd child processes are only told about configured DNSBLs when the
configuration is being parsed.
This is bad, because when authd crashes or is killed, IRCd will restart
it, but will not tell it about any configured DNSBLs until IRCd is next
rehashed.
We already have a dictionary that stores configured DNSBLs (for hit
statistics for `STATS n'), so store the additional needed fields in
that structure, and loop over that dictionary's entries when authd is
restarted, sending the fields just as if the configuration were being
reloaded.
Reported-By: @Unit193
Every other use of RPL_STATSDEBUG follows the format: <letter> :<text>
This case appeared to slip through because it's two-word argument is encoded
in a single `->data` buffer.
.need_oper is replaced with a generic mechanism for requiring any
privilege. need_admin remains because I think it's the least horrible
way to deal with oper:hidden_admin.
All need_oper requirements have been changed to oper:general
requirements.
I'm preparing to PR a succession of privs changes with the ultimate goal
of severely limiting the scope of the binary oper/user dichotomy and
move conceptually distinct oper functions into their own privs.
Accomplishing this is a non-trivial task, and can wait, but it's
inconvenient now to have such functions enabled by the same mechanism
that grants any privs at all--so I'm moving all of them to a
transitional priv with the intention of eroding that later.
As it stands, oper hiding is rather messy and inconsistent. Add
SeesOper(target, source), which is true iff target should appear as an
oper to source. If I haven't missed something, all commands that reveal
oper status now use the same logic.
general::hide_opers_in_whois is a special case, and affects /whois only.
general::hide_opers is introduced, and has the same effect as giving
everyone oper:hidden. All commands that reveal oper status respect both.
[ircd/match.c:316]: (error) Shifting a negative value is undefined behaviour
[librb/src/patricia.c:55]: (error) Shifting a negative value is undefined behaviour
[modules/m_alias.c:64]: (portability) '(void*)message' is of type 'void *'. When using void pointers in calculations, the behaviour is undefined.
[modules/m_time.c:111]: (warning) %u in format string (no. 9) requires 'unsigned int' but the argument type is 'signed int'.
[modules/m_time.c:111]: (warning) %u in format string (no. 10) requires 'unsigned int' but the argument type is 'signed int'.
[librb/src/dictionary.c:819]: (warning) %d in format string (no. 3) requires 'int' but the argument type is 'unsigned int'.
[librb/src/radixtree.c:1080]: (warning) %d in format string (no. 3) requires 'int' but the argument type is 'unsigned int'.
[ircd/s_user.c:351] -> [ircd/s_user.c:357]: (warning) Either the condition '0!=source_p' is redundant or there is possible null pointer dereference: source_p.
[extensions/ip_cloaking_3.0.c:109]: (warning, inconclusive) The buffer 'buf' may not be null-terminated after the call to strncpy().
[ircd/chmode.c:256]: (style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
[modules/m_help.c:100]: (style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
[modules/m_knock.c:169]: (style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
[modules/m_stats.c:628]: (style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
[modules/m_stats.c:727]: (style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
[librb/src/radixtree.c:601]: (style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
[librb/src/radixtree.c:704]: (style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
[librb/src/radixtree.c:739]: (style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
[librb/src/radixtree.c:763]: (style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
[librb/src/radixtree.c:768]: (style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
[librb/src/radixtree.c:774]: (style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
[librb/src/radixtree.c:781]: (style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
[librb/src/radixtree.c:786]: (style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
[librb/src/radixtree.c:791]: (style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
[librb/src/radixtree.c:804]: (style) Clarify calculation precedence for '&' and '?'.
[ircd/wsproc.c:372]: (style) Unused variable: len
[modules/core/m_modules.c:382]: (style) Unused variable: i
[modules/m_stats.c:741]: (style) Unused variable: amsg
[ircd/authproc.c:390]: (style) Unused variable: iter
[ircd/authproc.c:391]: (style) Unused variable: client_p
It's a bit of a hack, but better than before. Rather than rehashing
(which could get us into an endless loop), we now segregate the
configuration phase (creating entries ircd-side in case we restart authd
later) and sending phases (when configure_authd() is called). Since we
have to call configure_authd() no matter what (to send timeouts etc.)
and we have to send this data to configure authd anyway, and sending
duplicate data is bad, this is the only way I can think of for now.
This also does a lot of surgery on the conf system to reconfigure authd.
/!\ WARNING! ACHTUNG! ADVERTENCIA! ATTENTION! AVVERTIMENTO! /!\
This code has not been run-time tested yet (though it compiles)!
Also fix up some return values and stuff to use bool (or void if
nothing). I just did it whilst I was here.
According to jilles, the return value used to signify whether or not the
client had exited. This was error-prone and was fixed a long, long time
ago, but the return value was left int for historical reasons.
Since the return type is not used (and has no clear use case anyway),
it's safe to just get rid of it.
This was an asston of pain, and it still feels "dirty" as it introduces
an async call where there normally wouldn't be one. Better
implementation more than welcome.
