If an IPv4 connection is dropped by the pre-callback, and there is a
pending IPv6 connection on the same listening socket then the retried
accept() will be unable to populate `st` because `addrlen` will be too
small. Also initialise `st` each time to avoid a clang static analysis
warning.
strlcpy should be called with the size of the destination buffer, not
the length of the source string.
When the source is an empty string, the destination buffer isn't
written at all, resulting in it trying to output uninitialised data.
This could also cause a buffer overflow on very long invalid config
lines.
This change modifies extb_channel to allow matching users in secret
channels, which prevents trivial ban evasion by setting the target
channel +s. Information leak due to this change is unlikely since the
attacker would have to know that the target channel exists, the name of
the channel (or guess it), have a specific user they wanted to know
whether was in the channel (and not know already), and the target user
would need to have something like autojoin-on-invite enabled (or any of
the other various ways hostname cloaking is attacked).
ENCAP module. The ms_encap function is responsible for dispatching the
command handler and then the modules will eventually be reloaded.
However, if the ENCAP module is reloaded to a different address, the
stack now contains the address of a function that no longer exists.
Also, in this version of the IRCd, the module restarting functionality
was located in a function that is itself located in a module, so things
will also go badly if that module is reloaded to a different address,
too.
Return immediately from the command handler and have the event loop
call the function responsible for reloading the modules instead.
c.f. release/3.5 commit db05a36210
Reported-by: mniip (Freenode)
I run into this code even with a single kind of scanner with a single
port, so I'm not even sure how it thinks it already exists.
Perhaps it's being parsed twice, or something similar.
c.f. issue #229
When certificate validation fails, the certificate fingerprint won't be
calculated, resulting in an attempt to format NULL into a log line
showing the fingerprint. Instead, add a different error message for
missing fingerprint (i.e. validation failed).
When both account-tag and server-time are present but the client
doesn't have the first (i == 0) of these enabled. They will get
an erroneous ';' after the '@'.
Track whether or not there are tags present, and use this to
determine whether to add the ';' or not. Also remove the extra
function that loops over all of the tags by using this flag to
handle the case where there are no tags being written.
Build the same message but send it to the local client first,
so that the echo-message capability works. But don't do it when
sending a message to yourself.
As well as leaking a connid and leaving the connection open,
these calls to free_client() leave the client in the unknown_list
causing check_unknowns_list() to crash when either ptr->data
(ptr being the freed client_p->localClient->tnode) is NULL or
when client_p->localClient is NULL.
Flag the client as an IO error so that we don't try to send it
any data (as this is not a normal plaintext connection).
==00:00:01:09.081 1762== 48 bytes in 2 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 545 of 991
==00:00:01:09.081 1762== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==00:00:01:09.081 1762== by 0x56C14A2: rb_malloc (rb_memory.h:41)
==00:00:01:09.081 1762== by 0x56C177C: rb_bh_alloc (balloc.c:189)
==00:00:01:09.081 1762== by 0x56CA0A9: rb_make_rb_dlink_node (tools.c:65)
==00:00:01:09.081 1762== by 0x4E52D85: cache_file (cache.c:146)
==00:00:01:09.081 1762== by 0x4E52AC3: init_cache (cache.c:67)
==00:00:01:09.081 1762== by 0x4E69530: charybdis_main (ircd.c:762)
==00:00:01:09.081 1762== by 0x400815: main (main.c:8)
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== 2,808 bytes in 117 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 960 of 991
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== by 0x56C14A2: rb_malloc (rb_memory.h:41)
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== by 0x56C177C: rb_bh_alloc (balloc.c:189)
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== by 0x56CA0A9: rb_make_rb_dlink_node (tools.c:65)
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== by 0x4E52D85: cache_file (cache.c:146)
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== by 0x4E5337A: load_help (cache.c:301)
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== by 0x4E698AA: charybdis_main (ircd.c:848)
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== by 0x400815: main (main.c:8)
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== 5,328 (5,304 direct, 24 indirect) bytes in 221 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 971 of 991
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== by 0x56C14A2: rb_malloc (rb_memory.h:41)
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== by 0x56C177C: rb_bh_alloc (balloc.c:189)
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== by 0x56CA0A9: rb_make_rb_dlink_node (tools.c:65)
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== by 0x4E52D85: cache_file (cache.c:146)
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== by 0x4E53278: load_help (cache.c:266)
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== by 0x4E698AA: charybdis_main (ircd.c:848)
==00:00:01:09.100 1762== by 0x400815: main (main.c:8)
==01:17:20:36.920 5966== 429 bytes in 3 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 899 of 1,020
==01:17:20:36.920 5966== at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==01:17:20:36.920 5966== by 0x4E73867: rb_strdup (rb_memory.h:70)
==01:17:20:36.920 5966== by 0x4E7674C: conf_set_connect_fingerprint (newconf.c:1421)
==01:17:20:36.920 5966== by 0x4E78D55: conf_call_set (newconf.c:2562)
==01:17:20:36.920 5966== by 0x4E6A33D: yyparse (ircd_parser.y:215)
==01:17:20:36.920 5966== by 0x4E7FFC7: read_conf (s_conf.c:834)
==01:17:20:36.920 5966== by 0x4E81718: read_conf_files (s_conf.c:1419)
==01:17:20:36.920 5966== by 0x4E69567: charybdis_main (ircd.c:775)
==01:17:20:36.920 5966== by 0x400815: main (main.c:8)
==01:17:20:36.919 5966== 280 bytes in 8 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 876 of 1,020
==01:17:20:36.919 5966== at 0x4C2DB8F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==01:17:20:36.919 5966== by 0x4E93F4F: rb_strdup (rb_memory.h:70)
==01:17:20:36.919 5966== by 0x4E95280: ssl_process_cipher_string (sslproc.c:476)
==01:17:20:36.919 5966== by 0x4E95540: ssl_process_cmd_recv (sslproc.c:561)
==01:17:20:36.919 5966== by 0x4E9582A: ssl_read_ctl (sslproc.c:632)
==01:17:20:36.919 5966== by 0x56CBAB6: rb_select_epoll (epoll.c:199)
==01:17:20:36.919 5966== by 0x56C4EB5: rb_select (commio.c:2085)
==01:17:20:36.919 5966== by 0x56C7FD6: rb_lib_loop (rb_lib.c:228)
==01:17:20:36.919 5966== by 0x4E69987: charybdis_main (ircd.c:872)
==01:17:20:36.919 5966== by 0x400815: main (main.c:8)
==01:17:20:36.906 5966== 48 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 544 of 1,020
==01:17:20:36.906 5966== at 0x4C2FB55: calloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==01:17:20:36.906 5966== by 0x4E93F0C: rb_malloc (rb_memory.h:41)
==01:17:20:36.906 5966== by 0x4E961E8: start_zlib_session (sslproc.c:901)
==01:17:20:36.906 5966== by 0x4E86FAC: server_estab (s_serv.c:877)
==01:17:20:36.906 5966== by 0x13B2921A: mr_server (m_server.c:304)
==01:17:20:36.906 5966== by 0x4E7AF03: handle_command (parse.c:241)
==01:17:20:36.906 5966== by 0x4E7A96A: parse (parse.c:157)
==01:17:20:36.906 5966== by 0x4E7A3DC: client_dopacket (packet.c:354)
==01:17:20:36.906 5966== by 0x4E798D6: parse_client_queued (packet.c:98)
==01:17:20:36.906 5966== by 0x4E79FAC: read_packet (packet.c:282)
==01:17:20:36.906 5966== by 0x56CBAB6: rb_select_epoll (epoll.c:199)
==01:17:20:36.906 5966== by 0x56C4EB5: rb_select (commio.c:2085)
